Comparative analysis of 3D digital models vs. analog models in dentistry
Keywords:
CASTS, SURGICAL, DISTORTION, COMPLIANCE.Abstract
Introduction: technological innovation is growing every day in the area of dentistry, with the purpose not only to provide a dental diagnosis but also to carry out procedures with greater accuracy and reduce human errors.
Objective: to describe the new technologies on the most effective methods for obtaining impressions for dental prostheses with digital models.
Methods: bibliographic review carried out from databases used to compile information on taking impressions for dental prostheses with digital and analog models: PUBMED, SCIELO, through Google Scholar, in addition academic repositories, dental scientific journals, theses and books were used. Certain requirements were taken into account that the information used in this article had to meet, such as: coherent and truthful information, year of publication, verified reviews, and the use of the following information.
Development: this study shows that digital methods outperform traditional methods because they allow greater accuracy, which helps industry professionals to improve the treatment method and it is now recommended to use digital models because they have less variation and storage. Compared to traditional casts, if the variation is less, then in any oral rehabilitation when we treat, our treatment will have more accuracy, more adaptability, more stability and reduce possible errors.
Conclusions: the most effective way to take dental impressions is with a digital method because of its advantages such as accuracy and precision which helps to obtain more satisfactory results in the treatments.
Downloads
References
2. Trevejo-Bocanegra A, Fernández D, Calderón-Ubaqui V. Estereolitografía: Conceptos básicos. Rev Estomatol Herediana[Internet]. 2015 [citado 07/03/2023]; 23(2): 96. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v23i2.2300
3. Pinos Luzuriaga AG. “DIAGNÓSTICO DE MODELOS DE YESO VS DIGITALES: EXACTITUD Y FIABILIDAD EN LA COMPARACIÓN DEL ANÁLISIS DE BOLTON Y SUS MEDICIONES CORRESPONDIENTES”. Universidad de Cuenca. Facultad de Odontología. Cuenca, Ecuador [Internet]; 2015 [citado 07/03/2023]. Disponible en: https://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/24033/1/tesis.pdf
4. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. [Internet]; 2003 [citado 07/03/2023];124(1):101-5. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5
5. González G. Comparación de la precisión del método digital de escáner intraoral con el método convencional en la obtención de las medidas del ancho mesiodistal del espacio necesario en ambas arcadas de pacientes adultos atendidos en la Clínica de Odontología y Belleza Facial en el 2021-2022. Universidad de Panama. República de Panama. [Internet]; 2022 [citado 06/03/2023]. Disponible en: http://up-rid.up.ac.pa/5772/1/grace_gonzalez.pdf
6. Grau Sacoto MA. Evaluación de exactitud de los métodos convencionales y digitales para obtener impresiones dentales. Universidad Católica de Santiago de Gayaquil. Facultad de ciencias Médicas. Guayaquil, Eduador [Internet]; 2021 [citado 12/03/2023]. Disponible en: http://201.159.223.180/bitstream/3317/16112/1/T-UCSG-PRE-MED-ODON-590.pdf
7. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry[Internet]; 2014 [citado 07/03/2023]; 112(3): 555-60. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.002
8. Runkel C, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Keul C. Digital impressions in dentistry—accuracy of impression digitalisation by desktop scanners. Clin Oral Invest[Internet]; 2015 [citado 07/03/2023]; 24(3):1249-57. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-019-02995-w
